Copyright 2012, CABS for Reflections From the Fence
From the February 15, 1896 issue of the Michigan Messenger, published in Adrian, Lenawee County, Michigan:
The checker contest between Harry Wonder and L. F. Cole of Hillsdale, which has been going on for sometime, has ended in a draw. Each has won two games and two draws. The contest was carried on entirely by correspondence.
*Graphic thanks to OpenClipArt.org
.
More Special Pages From Reflections
- Home
- Heritage Flag & The Family Names
- Friend of Friends
- THE Trip, The Maps
- Disclaim THAT! Beholden to - -
- THE Trip, THE Encore' :: The Maps
- THE Trip, THE Encore' :: The Maps, Part Two
- THE Trip, THE Encore' :: The Maps, Part Three
- 2013 Thankful November
- Families Past :: Pedigree Charts
- Edna May Fenton Stevens Time Line Experiments
- Winter Sojourn 2014/15 :: The Maps
- Reflection's Contibutions to the Worldwide Genealo...
- Reflections Visits Nova Scotia
- European Union Stuff.
Showing posts with label Michigan Messenger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michigan Messenger. Show all posts
Friday, June 1, 2012
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Wedding Wednesday :: Jumps a Moving Train, Gets To The Chapel on Time
Copyright 2012, CABS for Reflections From the Fence
From the March 17, 1897 issue of the Michigan Messenger published at Adrian, Lenawee County, Michigan:
From FamilySearch, and waaahoooo, the bride's name and more:
Michigan, Marriages, 1868-1925
groom's name: Edward E. Hinds
groom's race:
groom's age: 31 years
groom's birth date: 1866
groom's birthplace: Michigan
bride's name: Mary A. Michaels
bride's race:
bride's age: 29 years
bride's birth date: 1868
bride's birthplace: Ohio
marriage type:
marriage date: 28 Feb 1897
marriage place: Clayton, Lenawee, Michigan
groom's father: Wm. Hinds
groom's mother: Jerusha Kamp
bride's father: Isaac Michaels
bride's mother: Rachael Mineer
groom's marital status:
groom's previous wife:
bride's marital status:
bride's previous husband:
film number: 2342507
frame number:
digital folder number: 4207941
image number: 499
reference number: v 3 p 64 rn 50
And, from the marriage record, it appears that they did indeed marry, note, only part of the record is shown here:
Next stop, find out what a bachelor tax is all about, here are two links, In Ye Olden Days: The Bachelor Tax and John McCurdy who wrote, Citizen Bachelors: Manhood and the Creation of the United States. So, I wonder, really a bachelor tax in 1897?? or is the staff of the newspaper taking a bit of liberty and poking some fun at our Edward?? What cha think??

*Source for the graphic long lost, my apologies to the artist and the web site.
.
From the March 17, 1897 issue of the Michigan Messenger published at Adrian, Lenawee County, Michigan:
From FamilySearch, and waaahoooo, the bride's name and more:
Michigan, Marriages, 1868-1925
groom's name: Edward E. Hinds
groom's race:
groom's age: 31 years
groom's birth date: 1866
groom's birthplace: Michigan
bride's name: Mary A. Michaels
bride's race:
bride's age: 29 years
bride's birth date: 1868
bride's birthplace: Ohio
marriage type:
marriage date: 28 Feb 1897
marriage place: Clayton, Lenawee, Michigan
groom's father: Wm. Hinds
groom's mother: Jerusha Kamp
bride's father: Isaac Michaels
bride's mother: Rachael Mineer
groom's marital status:
groom's previous wife:
bride's marital status:
bride's previous husband:
film number: 2342507
frame number:
digital folder number: 4207941
image number: 499
reference number: v 3 p 64 rn 50
And, from the marriage record, it appears that they did indeed marry, note, only part of the record is shown here:
Next stop, find out what a bachelor tax is all about, here are two links, In Ye Olden Days: The Bachelor Tax and John McCurdy who wrote, Citizen Bachelors: Manhood and the Creation of the United States. So, I wonder, really a bachelor tax in 1897?? or is the staff of the newspaper taking a bit of liberty and poking some fun at our Edward?? What cha think??
*Source for the graphic long lost, my apologies to the artist and the web site.
.
Wednesday, March 14, 2012
Wedding Wednesday, John M. Osborn, And the Anti-Nuptual Contract
Copyright 2012, CABS for Reflections From the Fence
During volunteer hours I spend working on book projects for the Lenawee County Family Researchers, I sometimes run across articles that peak my interest, here is one such article, a sorta anti-Wedding Wednesday.
The above article was published in the January 9, 1897 issue of the Michigan Messenger, published in Adrian, Lenawee County, Michigan:
"Some time ago John M. Osborn, near Hudson, married Sarah Tucker, a domestic in his household; Osborn had been married several times before, and to protect his children he made Sarah Sign an anti-nuptial contract that she should have a very small amount of his property at his death. After Osborn died, the wife brought action to set this agreement aside. Watts, Bean & Smith, of this city, with Fellows & Chandler, of Hudson, for the estate, filed a bill to have the provisions of the agreement operative. Judge Lane decided in favor of Mrs. Osborn, and now the supreme court has reversed the decision, and declared in favor of the estate."
I have not researched any of these people, I do not know anything more than what you see here. I find em, you enjoy em, and hopefully some day, someone will be able to use them in their research.

*Obviously, I did not digitally clean up this image, all those annoying lines from the microfilm printer. SIGH
.
During volunteer hours I spend working on book projects for the Lenawee County Family Researchers, I sometimes run across articles that peak my interest, here is one such article, a sorta anti-Wedding Wednesday.
The above article was published in the January 9, 1897 issue of the Michigan Messenger, published in Adrian, Lenawee County, Michigan:
"Some time ago John M. Osborn, near Hudson, married Sarah Tucker, a domestic in his household; Osborn had been married several times before, and to protect his children he made Sarah Sign an anti-nuptial contract that she should have a very small amount of his property at his death. After Osborn died, the wife brought action to set this agreement aside. Watts, Bean & Smith, of this city, with Fellows & Chandler, of Hudson, for the estate, filed a bill to have the provisions of the agreement operative. Judge Lane decided in favor of Mrs. Osborn, and now the supreme court has reversed the decision, and declared in favor of the estate."
I have not researched any of these people, I do not know anything more than what you see here. I find em, you enjoy em, and hopefully some day, someone will be able to use them in their research.
*Obviously, I did not digitally clean up this image, all those annoying lines from the microfilm printer. SIGH
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





